Time to Clean House, Both House and Senate

On December 19, 2009, Senator Ben Nelson, democrat, from Nebraska was granted immunity by the democratic Senate leadership from Medicaid funding mandates that all other states will be required to pay in return for his vote to pass the Senate Health Reform Bill.  Two weeks ago, Senator Mary Landrieu,  democrat from Louisiana acquired $300,000,000.00 from the Senate democratic leadership for the State of Louisiana in return for her vote to save the Senate Health Care Reform Bill.  Would you consider this blackmail, bribery, corruption at its highest level?  

Certainly an option very worthy of your consideration!

Pass It On For Our Country

And the memory of our Founding Fathers

At least read this.  Form your own opinion, even if you disagree with this issue, but at least read it..   You and I owe that to our country

All I ask is that you consider the suggestion here.

The entire Congress of the United States is corrupt..  And I mean both Houses and I mean both major parties.

 I realize that a few Members of each House are trustworthy, but, as a group they are absolutely the most corrupt bunch to ever disgrace our Nation.

 

In November of 2010 the entire House of Representatives will stand for re-election; all 435 of them.  One third of the Senate, a total of 33 of them, will also stand for re-election.

Vote every incumbent out.

  And I mean every one of them.  No matter their Party affiliation.

Let's start all over in the House of Representatives with 435 people who have absolutely no experience in running that body, with no political favors owed to anyone but their own constituents.  Let's make them understand that they work for us.

They are answerable to us and they simply have to run that body with some common sense.

Two years later, in 2012, vote the next third of the incumbents in the Senate out.   

 We can do the same thing in 2014 and, by that time we will have put all new people in that body as well.

We, the People, have got to take this Country back and we HAVE to do it peacefully.

 That's what the Framers of our Constitution envisioned.

I am also suggesting term limits on the NEW BUNCH -- 

8 YEARS FOR REPRESENTATIVES.  

AND 12 YEARS  [2 terms]  FOR SENATORS.

NO EXCEPTIONS.

THE LONGER THEY STAY INOFFICE THE MORE POWER THEY GET AND THEY LOVE IT AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET RE-ELECTED..

WE HAVE TERM LIMITED THE PRESIDENT –

NOW LET'S TERM LIMIT THE LEGISLATORS.

And we do away with their Special Retirement system and their health program (they should have same health programs everyone else in America does). When they are through serving their country they go back to being private citizens.  They should view their service as a privilege; after all it was designed to be a part time job to represent the voice of the people, NOT the special interest groups and those who can do favors for them.If they don’t like this proposal then don’t run for office…

Please, if you love this Country, send this (as I have done) to  absolutely everyone whose email address appears in your address book.

 This thing can permeate this Country in no time.  

Let's make it happen.

THIS MOVEMENT IS A RAPIDLY GROWING GRASS ROOTS MOVEMENT TO TAKE BACK CONTROL OF OUR GOVERNMENT.

Trumanisms

 

I'm not a fan to Harry Truman, but this could make me one very quickly.

Harry Truman was a different kind of President.  He probably  made as many, or more important decisions regarding our nation's  history as any of those other 42 Presidents preceding him. However, a measure  of his greatness may rest on what he did after he left the  White House.

The only asset he had when he died was the  house he lived in, which was in Independence Missouri. His wife had inherited the house from her mother and father and other than their years in the White House, they lived their entire lives as a couple there.

When he retired from office in 1952, his income was a U.S. Army pension reported to have been $13,507.72 a year. Congress, noting that he was paying for his stamps and  personally licking them, granted him an 'allowance' and,  later, a retroactive pension of $25,000 per year.

After President Eisenhower was inaugurated, Harry and Bess drove home to Missouri by themselves. There was no Secret Service following them.

When offered corporate positions at large salaries, he declined, stating, "You don't want me. You want the office of the President, and that doesn't belong to me. It belongs to the American people and it's not for sale."

Even later, on May 6, 1971, when Congress was preparing to award him the Medal of Honor on his 87th birthday, he refused to accept it, writing, "I don't consider that I have done anything which should be the reason for any award, Congressional or otherwise."

As president he paid for all of his own travel expenses and food.

Modern politicians have found a new level of success in cashing in on the Presidency, resulting in untold wealth. Today, many in Congress also have found a way to become quite wealthy while enjoying the fruits of their offices. Political offices are now for sale.  (e.g.   Illinois )

Good old Harry Truman was correct when he observed, "My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!

These folks have the right idea!!!

FT. HOOD vs. ISRAEL

Israelis Baffled by News of Defenseless US Soldiers  

Many Israelis want to know: why didn't the soldiers attacked by a U.S. Army major-turned-terrorist return fire?

When a Muslim goes, well, Muslim in Israel he is typically shot to death by someone--say, a reserve soldier--within seconds of screaming "Allah Akbar."

In contrast with the Israeli experience, it took 10 minutes before a civilian police officer at  Fort Hood was able to shoot and stop Muslim fanatic Nidal Malik Hasan.

How could that happen? How could so many people trained in the strategies and tactics of modern warfare be so defenseless?

The answer--and this may astonish many Americans--is that the victims were unarmed. U.S. soldiers are not allowed to carry guns for personal protection, even on a 340-acre base quartering more than 50,000 troops.

So it goes in brain-dead, liberal America .

Fort Hood is a "gun free" zone, thanks to regulations adopted in one of the very first acts signed into law by anti-gun President Bill Clinton in March, 1993. Click here for the file.

Contrary to President Obama's crocodile tears, his administration is bent on further disarming the U.S. military, and all Americans. Obama and his people will not rest until every American is a sitting duck.. 

POSTscript: Israeli teachers, from kindergarten on up, are also armed; so, a Virginia Tech-type slaughter is highly unlikely at an Israeli university.

Israelis, who have had to combat terrorism all their lives, are not afraid of guns. They are an armed people, ready, willing, and able to defend themselves and their country.

Unlike indoctrinated Americans, paralyzed by fear and political correctness, Israelis understand that people, not guns, kill people.

When will we ever learn?

VERY EMBARRASSING!!!

- Obama Crotch Salute -

Remember: Re-Elect No One!

The POTUSA (President of the United States of America) at Ft. Hood, Texas on Nov. 11, 2009... "Honoring" the 13 dead Obama refuses to salute, come to attention or even place his hand on his heart as the honor guard passes at the Memorial Service for those killed by a fellow Muslim terrorist at Fort Hood.!!

 
If this does not offend you nothing will!
I'm embarrassed that the World would see this.

 
 
ALL AMERICA NEEDS TO SEE THIS, BECAUSE OBAMA
IS AN IDIOT WHO WOULD RATHER PLAY WITH HIMSELF
THAN HONOR OUR MILITARY.

Domestic Enemy

We as Oath Keepers at one time or another swore or affirmed our oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, did we not?

So, I decided to find out what a particular phrase in this oath meant to the people who swore this oath.

My question was presented to active and retired firefighters, EMTs, law enforcement, military, politicians, civilians and to women who were not associated with the above groups.

It was amazing to hear the answers to my question, and that one would think that the enemy could be recognized hands down.

My question was, “Who is a domestic enemy?”

Most of the answers were on the order of: Anyone who lives within the borders of the United States and tries to disrupt or take over our government (most of the groups of the ‘alphabet soup’ came into play with this explanation).

Other explanations were along the same line of thought where a person or persons become a threat to disrupt our Constitution and our Freedoms such as where they threaten the civility and stability of the United States of America.

The second most popular answer was: ‘Any traitor to the United States who would sell State secrets to enemy countries, identity thieves, or a person like a rapist, an arsonist or a murderers who commits crimes against other people.

My second question that I asked was, “Would you be able to recognize a domestic enemy walking down the street or through your neighborhood?”

The puzzled looks that I got spoke louder than their words. Everyone stated that they could not recognize a domestic enemy, and one person stated that only a trained behaviorist could make that identification.

In a blog by Connor Boyack entitled, ‘Domestic Enemies of the Constitution’ he states: “How, then, can so many people swear to defend the Constitution from its enemies, yet remain unaware as to who such enemies are…?”

So as Oath Keepers, how does the issue of knowing who a Domestic Enemy is affect us, both individually and collectively if we are unaware of who he or she may be?

We can't be unaware, but we must diligent in order to support the Front Line Members of the Oath, for the enemy as does a thief comes to steal, kill, and destroy.

Remember, NOT ON OUR WATCH!

Martial Law and the Detention of American Citizens

I was speaking to an individual the other day and the conversation came up about being ready for a disaster and what he and I would do if something like this were to happen.

Immediately, Katrina came to mind and how the people there were not ready for such a thing to happen, but what if something like that were to happen again in the United States, today?

Well what can I say, because we just had an underwear bomber who was going to enter into his believed netherworld as a eunuch to mesmerize his many virgins.

Back on point, we spoke about having ‘to go bags or emergency boxes’ that were already prepared for such an emergency, and I know that there are some people who have such prepared just in case, as do I.

It’s not that I’m expecting something to happen; it’s just that no one really knows when a disaster or an emergency will strike.

But the bigger question is, ‘Where do we go and what do we do if a disaster were to happen?’

Is the city where we live prepared to respond to such an incident or greater catastrophe at a moment’s notice?

New Orleans was supposed to be, but as it turned out, it was far from being prepared. I know that the First Responders in our cities do practice drills as does the military, BUT..?

Will our local ‘First Responders’ be there to direct the traffic out of town or will they direct us to a staging area out in the middle of nowhere to a ready prepared site, much like the people were directed to the ‘Super Dome’ of Katrina? Not that the Super Dome was out in the middle of nowhere.

Will FEMA come in and take control of the situation and make our local ‘First Responders’ step down because FEMA is supposed to be more ready to handle emergencies than First Responders?

Will all who refuse to cooperate with FEMA be designated as ‘Enemy Combatants’ if we refuse to cooperate with FEMA?

Will all of the men and young boys be forced to handle the clean-up of the mess from the holocaust, under the direction of FEMA guards?

Will the women and young children remain interned in that desolate area somewhere to clean, and keep the place prepared for the returning workforce in the evening?

The next question is would all of our personal belongs, food, currency, and weapons (should we have one) be confiscated from us and the food and clothing rationed back to us as a group of interned individuals?

In these situations, the President can order Marshal Law, since it has precedence already from the 1987 Iran-Contra Scandal.

What happened at that time was a plan was devised that the Constitution would be suspended and martial law would be imposed, internment camps set up and the government turned over to the President and FEMA.

Again in 1987, it was reported that FEMA had plans to combat a national uprising by African-American militants, and was able to provide detention for at least 21 million people.

Even plans were in the process for the military to be deployed on American streets, and that’s why the U.S. Military had created a Northern Command to aid Homeland Security.

You say it couldn’t happen? What happened in 1941? Japanese-American citizen were rounded up and placed in detention or concentration camps.

What happened in New Orleans in 2005 when Katrina struck?

Today there are rumors about military training in California for the coming incarceration of American citizens.

Talk about Interpol being exempt in some circumstances; yet the United Nations is exempt from all, because the U.S. is a member and therefore their troops can come on UN soil, which we are, and take control.

Rumors are running rampant and spreading like wildfire, and each have to be checked out naturally, but make sure it’s a reliable source.

Are you ready? Will it be in 2010?

Remember, it’s our job as Oath Keepers to make sure that those who enforce the law know what the law is, because those who are sworn in may not know the fullness of their oath, because the domestic enemy is hidden within.

Remember, some of these Oath Takers may not know that the Constitution of the United States prohibits the internment of Americans without charges or trial.

Furthermore, they may not care that it states that this internment would be acts of war and treason against the American people, regardless of the legal pretext that the domestic enemy insist is Constitutional.

What would we as citizens of the United States do if this would happen to us? Could it happen to We the People is a better question.

There are many naysayers out there trying to play this down, and if we are unaware, tomorrow we could be…

As Oath Keepers, we must reach out to our local First Responders, our National Guard, our local Military personnel so they know that they do not have to obey an unlawful order, according to the Constitution, because our socialist public school system doesn’t want We the Free People to know the truth.

Let it not happen on our watch.

Freedom Fighters Still Live in the 21st Centry

I used to write for my local newspaper here in Mesquite, Nevada until I was diagnosed with prostate cancer. It was at that time, that I gave the editor my resignation notice due to my situation, for I wanted to spend that time to study what I had and what could be done on my part for this type of cancer.

So, it was during this time that in March of 2009 that I came across an article in the WorldNetDaily online edition about Oath Keepers. I read the article by Bob Unruh entitled, "Soldiers Pledge to refuse disarmament demands." Needless to say, I was amazed at what I read.

I was in the US Navy from 1963 until 1967, and I don't remember taking such an oath, but that's been many moons ago, and things like that to a young buck generally gets overlooked due to the state of mind that one's in at the time.

I was raised in a disciplined family from a young age, and that gave me direction and understanding of what I wanted to do with the rest of my life. I don't regret joining the Navy and serving my Country even when it was unpopular, but the unpopular were really the ones with no direction in life.

I don't regret the disciplined home that I was raised within, but I'm sad that many a young man and young woman has missed such a great opportunity and even opted out not to become military oriented as I and my generation, even though there was much descent.

But back to where I first heard about the Oath Keepers. I remember reading this article and it came at the right time that I needed it, for I was writing an article at the time that went right along with this WorldNetDaily article's ideology: Oath Keepers, Not On Our Watch!

And so, I began to talk about the ideology of the Oath Keepers at that time and the FEMA Death Camps, and how that our military would NOT guard the camp's entry gates to keep the citizens hostage.

But then one day at work this month, I was walking past a news stand and the headline in the Las Vegas Review Journal News Paper read, "Ready to Revolt" caught my eye, and I couldn't go any further until I read the article.

I knew then that I would join this organization to support the law enforcement officers and the military personnel who would not intern my fellowmen and women who were innocent bystanders in a government that could explode into turmoil.

In reading the LV Review Journal, I noticed that a usual Hate America group was there throwing comments bombs around which seem to only come from their mouth. Lies of racism, hate, and everything else negative.

This just emboldened me the more to become an Oath Keeper, just because of the lies and undocumented and unsupported proof and the propaganda of what the enemy states and stands for.

I then began to talk to people where I work and my family and friends about the Oath Keepers, and low and behold, the people whom I talked to began to join, and others just scoffed at me; however, that was expected.

To me, having a group like Oath Keepers means that never again will people be subjugated like they were during Katrina and enslaved within the locked 'Superdome' on our watch.

It's going to take time, I know, because many have been brainwashed into thinking that the lie is the truth and vice versa.

However, NOT ON OUR WATCH!

President George H.W. Bush Walks on His Namesake

May 26, 2009, namesake former President George H. W. Bush was airlifted aboard the USS Bush. - Did you read it in papers or see it on TV?

On May 26, 2009, namesake former President George H. W. Bush was airlifted aboard the USS Bush for a one day visit. It had been his greatest wish to watch flight operations from the flight deck of the navy's newest nuclear powered aircraft carrier and to meet the Sailors. As a decorated former naval aviator in World War II, this has a special significance for him. He was accompanied by his daughter (and the ship's sponsor) "Doro" Bush Koch.

They observed flight ops from the flight deck and the bridge, dined with officers in the Flag Mess and watched night flight ops from the Flag Bridge . The next morning he dined in the Chief's Mess and was escorted around, meeting and greeting Sailors. Finally, we had the crew assembled in hangar bay 2. The CO pointed out that June 12th is his birthday (he'll be 85 years old) and nearly 2,500 Sailors sang happy birthday to him. He then swore in re-enlistees and read the promotion orders to all recently advanced Sailors (and there were a bunch of them). Lastly, he spoke to the crew. It was quite a moment - at the end of his short remarks, he looked up, paused for a second, and said "This ship means the world to me.." and he then broke down for a few seconds. There wasn't a dry eye in the hangar bay. He then continued on and thanked every one of the crew for their service to the country and for making him proud as one of 'his' Sailors'.
 

This may have been the first time in US Navy history that a ship's namesake (certainly an aircraft carrier) not only was alive at the time of commissioning, but was healthy enough to go aboard when the ship was at sea.

President George H.W. Bush Walks on His Namesake

Tea Party Kickoff Rally a Huge Success

Hi everyone! We've now launched the Tea Party Express II: Countdown to Judgment Day with a giant rally in San Diego. It was incredible!! The crowd was huge - numbering in the thousands! The sun was shining on this naval town with our rally on the water and the U.S.S. Midway serving as the backdrop. Sorry Keith Olbermann and any critics of the Tea Party Express - but "We The People" came together in San Diego today and our voice was heard!
I can't begin to tell you how exciting the event was and how meaningful it was for all of us. If you were there you know the energy that radiated through the crowd.
The speakers at the rally were great - including nationally syndicated radio talk show host, Roger Hedgecock and California conservative hero, Chuck DeVore, who is challenging Barbara Boxer for Congress. The musical performers were great. It just doesn't get any better than this.

We'll be posting continuous updates on the tour at our blog:
http://teapartyexpressblog.blogspot.com

Barney Frank present during Marijuana bust

 Rep. Barney Frank admitted Friday that he was sitting on the porch of his partner’s Maine home when police came to arrest his partner for marijuana possession.



Frank, responding to new reports that he was present during the Aug. 2007 arrest of James Ready, said in a statement he was unaware Ready had marijuana plants.
According to a police report obtained by MyFoxBoston, Maine police arrested and charged James Ready with marijuana possession, cultivation and use of drug paraphernalia. He pleaded guilty to civil possession and paid a fine. The remaining charges were dismissed last year.

Frank is the author of a medical marijuana bill that would outlaw the prosecution of persons who use marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Frank was not charged.

My question is why Frank was not arrested as an accessory after the fact? He was siiting on the porch while the perp was committing the crime.

Breaking News: Not All Racial Profiling Is Un-American

By John Lillpop Tuesday, November 10, 2009

In post-rational America, racial profiling has become the ‘go to’ defense for those who are as guilty as hell but need some way to escape justice.

The lengths to which some minorities will go to exploit racial profiling are both maddening and mind boggling.

An example, as reported, in part, at discriminations.com back in 2004:

“OAKLAND—Oakland police officers have stopped setting up roadblocks to check whether drivers are under the influence because of a rash of complaints from the Latino community and City Council President Ignacio De La Fuente.
“The checkpoints, which allow officers to demand licenses and proof of insurance, are an effective way to get drunken drivers off Oakland’s streets, city leaders agree. But the checks also have ensnared dozens of illegal immigrants who are not licensed to drive yet otherwise obey the law.”

Why would any responsible, thinking adult conclude that protecting illegal immigrants is a greater priority than getting drunken drivers off the road? What would motivate such stupidity?

The answer: Hispanic racism.

Ignacio De La Fuente was so obsessed with protecting fellow Hispanics that he lost sight of the needs of the community at large.

Unfortunately, De La Fuente is hardly alone in his willingness to sacrifice the greater good in order to carry water for illegal aliens because those criminals happen to be Hispanic.

As reported, in part, at rollcall.com, the Hispanic caucus in the House of Representatives threatened to sabotage Nancy Pelosi’s health care blowout in order to advance the cause of illegal aliens:

“Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairwoman Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.) warned President Barack Obama on Thursday that 20 members of her caucus are prepared to vote against the House Democratic health care plan if language restricting the rights of illegal immigrants to buy insurance is added to the bill.

“Velázquez met with Obama at the White House with a handful – you’ll have to go here to read the rest of the article from the Canadian Free Press http://bit.ly/2DJ5VB

The Misnomer of Radical Islam America’s Security Blunder

June 27, 2008
by Martel Sobieskey

Before this article is read by you, here is what qualifies Mr. Sobieskey's statements which by the way I agree with wholehartedly.

Martel Sobieskey has 35 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, educators, and security personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched Jihadist religious conditioning inherent in Islam.

There is the erroneous assertion that Radical Islam is not connected with mainstream (moderate) Islam in any way, that the religion of Islam has been “hijacked by a few extremists” that the vast majority of Muslims do not agree with the Islamofascists. Such thinking is a terrible error and a grave threat to America’s national security, especially in this age of nuclear terrorism.

So what is Radical Islam and what should it be properly named? Radical Islam is actually the Islamic Military. The so-called radicals are not a fringe element; they are fully supported by the worldwide Islamic community (Ummah). If they were a fringe element, they would have been defeated long ago. The fight rages on because of strong support from the moderates both covertly and overtly. This means the Islamic Military (wrongly labeled radicals) is intimately connected with moderate Muslims who we have mistakenly labeled as innocent bystanders.

Moderate Muslims are not innocent bystanders. Moderate Muslims provide the base of operations which makes it possible for the Islamic Military to continue their terrorist operations. Hate America, demands to replace constitution with the Koran, and outbursts for Sharia law are preached openly from nearly every Mosque in America under the guise of freedom of speech and religion. Freedom of speech and religion has morphed into a weaponized tool of Islamic psychological warfare which is defeating America’s will to protect her national security. Any American who says Islam is less than perfect may become the victim of an unfair lawsuit by a “moderate” Muslim organization.

Why can one be so certain about this fact? The answer is the Koran. The Koran fuses together both moderates and their military. No Muslim dares to contradict the Koran because the penalty is — death and loss of personal salvation. The moderate Muslims of every nation, including those in America fully support their Islamic military because worldwide conquest is the primary religious duty of all Muslims. Fellow Americans if you believe that your local Muslims are not secretly harboring in their hearts an agenda for the conquest of America by Islam then you are dead wrong, and understand nothing about the Koran.

Moderate Muslims may not carry weapons and murder innocent people hands on, but they play the role of “wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Moderate Muslims use two primary strategies to make conquest for Islam. The first is dawa, which is influence peddling, “wining and dining” and manipulation. You make conquest by “pleasing” your opponent, “buttering them up” — bribery and back room dealings are common place. There is a “ton” of Muslim oil money buying preferential treatment for Islam in America. The second is taqiyya, which is outright deception and lying. Deception and lying to infidels as a strategy of conquest is one of Islam’s most valued “weapons”, a precedent set by the prophet Mohammed himself. Americans hear this deception everyday with proclamations that “Islam is a religion of peace.” This phrase is an excellent example of successful psychological warfare which has caused Americans to let down their guard, and made us very vulnerable to future terrorist attacks, even possible nuclear attacks as several experts have pointed out.

Recent history proves that the “so called peaceful Muslims” work as a team with their Islamic Military. They immigrate to a country touting what peaceful law abiding citizens they are, establish themselves, build mosques, increase their numbers and “bingo” terrorists acts start occurring in the host country. Do the attacks in Spain, England, France, Thailand, Bali, the Philippines, Holland, Sweden and the USA ring any bells here? All these attacks have been preceded by the establishment of moderate mosque communities which in turn became footholds from which the Islamic military could launch their terrorist attacks. The larger the percentage of Muslims that occupy a country the greater the havoc they wreak. The situation is directly proportional. Reducing the percentage of Muslims that dwell in the host country is the most effect way of stopping terrorism. Western governments must evaluate this fact very seriously if they wish to win the war against Islamofascism long term.

Have we Americans become gullible fools? As long as we fail to deal aggressively and comprehensively with the intimate Koranic connection between the moderate Muslims and their Islamic military we can never stop the terrorist attacks. Have you ever wondered why, so numerous the complaints worldwide, that Muslims are not assimilating into their host nation? It is because they are not there to assimilate — they are there to conqueror the host country for Islam as their Koran requires. Fellow Americans please read the Koran for your self. Don’t take my word on it. You will learn first hand that anyone who tells you that Islam is a religion of peace is insulting your intelligence. The Penguin Classic edition, The Koran, translated by the Arab Scholar N. J. Dawood is a well respected version having sold over a million copies worldwide.

The best description of the symbiotic Koranic relationship between the moderates and their military comes from the Muslims themselves. They have a saying, “the poisonous fish swim in the sea”. The “poisonous fish” are the militants and the “sea” is the moderate mosque community. For example, for their 9/11 operation, the Islamic Military (poisonous fish) used the Al Farouq mosque in New York as the “sea” from which they “swam” to pulverize the trade towers. The next poisonous fish may be swimming from the sea of your local Mosque community with a nuclear explosion. Wake up Americans we are not fighting with bows and arrows anymore. We must take aggressive preventative measures to stop the Islamic military’s “euphoric” obsession to make a nuclear attack on American soil.

It is a great mistake to continue calling the Islamic military radicals because the term “radicals” has blinded us to think that the moderates are not in cahoots with their Islamic Military. In so doing we have violated the primary dictum of warfare which is to know and understand one’s enemy. Consequently, we have failed to understand that the Islam of Osama Bin Laden is main stream Islam – not a radical fringe. Osama Bin Laden is one of the generals of the Islamic military which is fully supported by the worldwide community of moderate Muslims, including American Muslims. Both moderate Muslims and their military have the same goal which is the Islamic conquest of the entire world — this is the primary religious duty of all Muslims as required by the Koran. Americans desperately need to understand this fact if they wish to protect their country from great harm.

Our Government at Work

 You've got to be kidding!!! Other folks would get fired if they did this on the job...time to fire them all!!!

 House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues Rep Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire. This happened when the House was in a night session to vote on the new budget. (AP)

The guy sitting in the row in front of these two is on Facebook. The guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores.

These are the folks that can't get the budget out by Oct. 1. Now we know why!
So, they voted to approve a 30 day budget extension. With these clowns in charge, 30 days from now we will be in the same boat, and these 2 yo-yo’s will still be playing SOLITAIRE!

No further proof is needed. It is time to dump them all, and reduce all elected officials to two terms.
No more lifelong tenure, free healthcare, exorbitant pensions, voting in their own pay raises, etc.

Rules for Radicals

Knowing this rules helps one to combat the enemy. If you know your enemy, you know how to defeat your oppressor. Therefore I have posted these here to help us overcome -- fighting fire with fire.

Get to know Them....

In 1971, Saul Alinsky wrote an entertaining classic on grassroots organizing titled Rules for Radicals. Those who prefer cooperative tactics describe the book as out-of-date. Nevertheless, it provides some of the best advice on confrontational tactics. Alinsky begins this way:
What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.
His “rules” derive from many successful campaigns where he helped poor people fighting power and privilege
For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting what is wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don’t have the power to change a bad situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a bad situation. Alinsky would say, “The first step in community organization is community disorganization.”

Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a “mass army” that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.

Alinsky provides a collection of rules to guide the process. But he emphasizes these rules must be translated into real-life tactics that are fluid and responsive to the situation at hand.

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”Delete Comment

Murdoch: Glenn Beck Right on Obama 'Racist'

Newsmax.com Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:28 PM

In an interview with his own Sky News Australia, News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch said he agreed with Glenn Beck's view that President Barack Obama's has made racist comments.

“He did make a very racist comment about blacks and whites, etc, which, he said in his campaign he’d be completely above,” Murdoch told the interviewer. “And, that was something which perhaps shouldn’t have been said about the president. If you actually assess what he (Beck) was talking about, he was right.”

Beck made the comments in July after the arrest of Obama’s close friend, the scholar Henry Louis Gates, by a white Cambridge police officer. Beck was making the larger point that instead of letting the facts speak for themselves, Obama immediately drew the most sinister interpretation of the police officer’s motives.

"This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy, over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture," Beck said. "I don't know what it is."

"I'm not saying he doesn't like white people," Beck said. "I'm saying he has a problem. He has a -- this guy is, I believe, a racist."





On Wednesday, a News Corp. spokesman stressed to Politico that Murdoch “does not at all, for a minute, think the president is a racist.”
If Obama was a racist how does he live with himself, since he is both white and black? I think that Obama does have a problem and it's because of his education from a bunch of Idiots. Just a monkeys beget monkeys so do idiots beget idiots.

Dick Morris: Obama Handcuffs Terror Probers

Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:06 AM

By: Jim Meyers Article Font Size

Veteran political analyst Dick Morris tells Newsmax that the Obama administration is "deliberately mischaracterizing" the Fort Hood massacre by refusing to admit it was a terrorist attack.

Morris also said the failure to recognize the danger posed by Major Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused of the killings, points to "Obama's failures in the war on terror."

What the hell is wrong with our President? Is he an idiot? Doesn't he know what's what or is he hiding something? If he's hiding something, he's hiding his intelligence from his brain or is it that George Soros is pulling Obama's ears so the hurt and thus Obama is brainwashed. That's my opinion.

Listen to this NewMax video with Dick Morris.

http://video.newsmax.com/?bcpid=20972460001&bclid=22770166001&a...

How Long O Lord Until You Avenge Our Blood On Them

Well, here we are nine years after the original 911, and we have another attack on American soil.

How long, O Lord, until You avenge our blood on them?

The first attack on America took us into World War 2, and we devastated the enemy. On September 11, 2001, we were attacked again and we were all united and were ready to kill the enemy, except for some Liberal Stupidly reason we didn't, and now we're still paying for it, NINE YEARS LATER.

But what's said about this Terrorist Attack at Fort Hood? And many will say that I'm off point on calling this a Terrorist Attack, but what did the Associated Press print? On November 6, 2009, the AP stated, "...soldiers who witnessed (it) reported that the gunman shouted, "Allah Akbar!" before opening fire at the Texas post."

To me, that's a terrorist cry to the death.

But what does NBC news say on the subject? "Army Lieutenant General Robert Cone said, 'there are firsthand accounts" as to Hasan's "Muslim religious chant." This Army psychiatrist, Hasan, is described as a devout Muslim according to media reports on Friday.

Furthermore, it's stated that: 'investigators and the FBI have not ruled out the possibility it was a terrorist attack...' I guess with all of the witnesses, where it was done, and who committed this terrorist attack needs more investigation.

I’m wondering that maybe after 10 years from today, as they drag their feet, we all will have forgotten that it was a domestic terrorist who killed the Americans at Fort Hood.

The oath that's taken by the military states that they will, "Defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic...." did I miss something? I don't know, but the media spin stated, 'evidence indicated it was not likely a domestic terrorist attack." Interesting!

Who added that part about the FBI or the investigators? Have they already concluded that it was just a accident? There was an unholy yell prior to the firing of the murderous gun which must have went off accidently when Husan pulled the trigger killing innocent bystanders.

What makes this matter worse is that the "Great and Holy" president Obama called it a "tragic" and "a horrific outburst of violence." To me, this wanna be president is afraid to say that his mosque-brother committed a TERRORIST ATTACK. Wake up Mr. president, it was a terrorist attack on American soil. An attack that happened on your watch and that makes YOU responsible.

What adds insult to injury is how the Muslim people responded to this. Nadar Hasan, Major Hasan's cousin, said that his family was "filled with grief for the families of today's victims", according to NBC. He continues to say, "Our family loves America. We are proud of our country..." My questions WHICH country? If the Muslim population wants to be part of America, let them integrate as Americans.

Here's what members of the Texas mosque had to say, according to the New York Times: "Leaders of the vibrant Muslim community here expressed outrage on Friday at the shooting rampage being laid to one of their members..." and, "the military command should be held accountable..."

My question is why weren't Hasan's brothers-in-religion in tune to him? They should be held accountable for not doing or saying something to prevent his anger or his holy jihad from happening.

After all, Muslims don't want to be part of the American culture, they just want the country to be theirs and not responsible for what happens in the American culture as it is now.

Did I miss something again?

The NY Times continues, “The Islamic community strongly condemns this cowardly attack, which was particularly heinous in that it was directed at the all-volunteer army that protects our nation,” Dr. Farooqi said.

But again why weren't these people paying attention to their own, because the Army knew, and Hasan was under Army surveillance.

Want insult to injury? "Nihad Awad, the national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said, “We reiterate the American Muslim community’s condemnation of this cowardly attack."

CAIR, in my opinion, HATES America because it's not a Muslim nation, yet. Muslim's do NOT like Infidel nations like the United States of America, and the Democratic party is right there kissing their butt and telling them that they're right in their consensus.

More to the real story about the Muslim loving the USA: "Duane Reasoner Jr., an 18-year-old substitute teacher whose parents worked at Fort Hood said, 'In the Koran, you’re not supposed to have alliances with Jews or Christian or others, and if you are killed in the military fighting against Muslims, you will go to hell.' And I guess that's more important than being an American.

I still must be missing the point somewhere here, ain’t' I?

Posted in the WorldNetDaily.com on November 06, 2009, Bob Unruh wrote this: 'A website run by radical Muslims today honored Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the man accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas, as an "Officer and a Gentleman," saying his actions should not be denounced.

The massacre yesterday, which also left more than two dozen injured, was called a "pre-emptive attack" by supporters of the Revolution Muslim website'

But wait, what's this? 'Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the alleged shooter in yesterday's massacre at Fort Hood, played a homeland security advisory role in President Barack Obama's transition into the White House, according to a key university policy institute document.' WHAT??

Here’s a good ole boy's liberal press quote from the Koran a book that each of them have in their desk drawer: 'a tenet of Islam says, “We do have the right to retaliate,” Duane Reasoner Jr. said. And Reasoner Jr. continued, “but he who does not is twice blessed.'

No one has the right to retaliate, because that's why we in the United States of America have laws by which we are judged and not some whacked out tenet.

If anybody doesn't like America, leave. You won't be missed.

Do you know where your president stands? If not watch this video:

A New Global Currency System

There are many other videos on YouTube.com regarding this Anti-American, Scumbag Soros for you to watch and listen to what HE plans to try and bring about.

By Michael E. Telzrow, who is Executive Director of the National Railroad Museum and a Contributor to The New American magazine.

“George Soros advocated a “new global currency system,” and called the decline of the dollar necessary.
He stopped short of predicting the end of the dollar but characterized a managed decline in the value of the dollar as a "healthy, if painful adjustment," citing the United States as a drag on the world economy.”

If Soros, loves the USA, he wouldn’t have all of his money off shore and he would be paying his fair share of taxes. This guy is an enemy of the United States and he’s pulling a lot of Washington strings.

I don’t think that he should be allowed to do his underhanded manipulating of OUR government, since he’s not even an American Citizen. I would even bet that this scum is an ‘Illegal.’

Go to this site to read more of what Soros is trying to do to destroy the USA. Look under the heading: Soros Calls for More Global Regulation of Currency at http://www.jbs.org

An Officers Outrage Over Fort Hood

By Major Shawn Keller

As an officer in the United States Army, I'm angry for so many reasons over what happened at Ft. Hood. I'm angry that twelve of my fellow soldiers and a contractor were murdered. I'm angry that over thirty people have suffered life altering injuries from which they will never fully recover. I'm angry that the lives of so many families have been forever ruined. I'm angry that this happened on an Army post on American soil where soldiers should be safe. And I'm angry that the murderer was a terrorist who masqueraded as an Army officer for half a dozen years.

But as angry as I am at what happened, I'm even angrier that it was allowed to happen. Apparently, there was no shortage of warning signs that Hasan identified more with Islamic Jihadists than he did with the US Army. From speeches, writings, conversations, affiliations and postings on Jihadist websites, there were more than enough dots to connect that should have exposed Hasan as someone inclined to attack innocent people in the furtherance of a political, religious and ideological agenda. There were more than enough red flags raised that, at a minimum, should have gotten Hasan kicked out of the Army.

But just like September 11, those agencies and individuals charged with keeping America and Americans safe failed to connect the dots that would have saved lives. Jihadist rhetoric espoused by Hasan was categorically dismissed out of submissiveness to the concepts of tolerance and diversity. The Army as an institution has been neutered by decades of political correctness and the leaders in Hasan's chain-of-command failed to act accordingly out of fear of being labeled anti-Muslim and receiving a negative evaluation report. The counter-terrorism agencies knew Hasan was communicating with Al-Qaeda and dismissed it as academic research instead of delving deeper into the probability that a terrorist had infiltrated the ranks.

Even four hours after Hasan stood on a desk yelling Allahu Akbar! and opened fire, the FBI stated that they were not investigating the attack as an act of terrorism even as there were still reports of other gunmen on the loose. Meanwhile, the Army continues to dismiss it as a "tragedy" and an "isolated incident by a lone gunman" while the media has invented the psychological condition of post-traumatic stress disorder by proxy. There is more concern for promoting the appropriate information operation campaign and maintaining the illusion of safety than there is for actually exposing the weaknesses and faults in the system that allowed this to happen. We're even being told that damage to the Army's efforts at diversity would be a greater tragedy than the murder of the twelve soldiers -- how ironic the week of Veterans' Day.

This has nothing to do with being anti-Islamic. After numerous tours to Iraq and working with countless cultural advisors on Ft. Bragg, I know dozens of Muslims who I respect and admire greatly. This has everything to do with force protection and security being trumped by the concepts of political correctness and diversity. This has everything to do with a hypocritical system and culture that breeds timidity and dismissiveness in the interest of career advancement. If I preached a white-supremacist ideology or described Timothy McVeigh as a hero to the cause of freedom and liberty, how long do you think I would still be in the military drawing a salary, receiving educational benefits and getting promoted like Hasan did?

Hasan's radical ideology grew to the point that he committed mass murder because too many leaders were too afraid to lead out of fear of harming their career or the image of the Army. If those leaders don't have the intestinal fortitude, moral conviction or personal courage to stand up, speak up and protect soldiers, then retire, resign or get out of the way and let somebody else do it for you.

Shawn Keller is a Major in the United States Army stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

This is a good example of political correctness and lack of balls that has become prevalent not only in our military but in our civilian lives as well. All of our senior military leaders, our political leaders, and we as well are all afraid to make any comment that might be identified as racist or prejudicial of any other religion, and unfortunately that is a direction that has intensified during the later years of my military career and is still getting worse today. And yet we let a few people dictate whether we can say a prayer in public or have anything of this nature printed on our public buildings. We just go along with it sort of like the Jews did in Germany until they all found themselves in the concentration camps and it was then too late.

And if anyone thinks that the Moderate Muslims are on OUR side, you're kidding yourself and believe everything that our Idiot Preisdent thinks and believes.

Also, I don't think any of us have really thought about the consequences that will very likely result from national bankruptcy that we are letting ourselves get led into. If at some point, other countries, such as China, decide that they can no longer afford to keep our economy afloat, then what happens???