Saturday, August 27, 2011

Cowboy rules for the Wild West are as follows:

1. Pull your pants up. You look like an idiot.

2. Turn your cap right, your head ain't crooked.

3. Let's get this straight: it's called a 'gravel road.' I drive a pickup truck because I want to. No matter how slow you drive, you're gonna get dust on your Lexus. Drive it or get out of the way.

4. They are cattle. That's why they smell like cattle. They smell like money to us. Get over it. Don't like it? I-10 & I-40 go east and west, I-17 & I-15 goes north and south. Pick one and go.

5. So you have a $60,000 car. We're impressed. We have $250,000 Combines that are driven only 3 weeks a year.

6. Every person in the Wild West waves. It's called being friendly. Try to understand the concept.

7. If that cell phone rings while a bunch of geese/pheasants/ducks/doves are comin' in during a hunt, we WILL shoot it outta your hand. You better hope you don't have it up to your ear at the time.

8. Yeah. We eat trout, salmon, deer and elk. You really want sushi and caviar? It's available at the corner bait shop.

9. The 'Opener' refers to the first day of deer season. It's a religious holiday held the closest Saturday to the first of November.

10. We open doors for women. That's applied to all women, regardless of age.

11. No, there's no 'vegetarian special' on the menu. Order steak, or you can order the Chef's Salad and pick off the 2 pounds of ham and turkey.

12. When we fill out a table, there are three main dishes: meats, vegetables, and breads. We use three spices: salt, pepper, and ketchup! Oh, yeah ... We don't care what you folks in Cincinnati call that stuff you eat... IT AIN'T REAL CHILI!!

13. You bring 'Coke' into my house, it better be brown, wet and served over ice. You bring 'Mary Jane' into my house, she better be cute, know how to shoot, drive a truck, and have long hair.

14. College and High School Football is as important here as the Giants, the Yankees, the Mets, the Lakers and the Knicks, and a dang site more fun to watch.

15. Yeah, we have golf courses.. But don't hit the water hazards - it spooks the fish.

16. Turn down that blasted car stereo! That thumpity-thump ain't music, anyway. We don't want to hear it anymore than we want to see your boxers! Refer back to #1!

Is YOUR Doctor on Drug Commissions?

Of course I already knew this, but no one would believe me when I said it. When one has the ability to discern and understand what the signs on the roadways say, it's not hard to determine what awaits you up ahead. It's like walking down the street and being able to avoid any undesirable situation, like a personal confrontation with a criminal and you lose your wallet, identification, and possibility even being shot and injured in the process.

And so here's the verification by Bob Livingston:

In Birmingham, Ala., some doctors get paid
handsome sums when they prescribe certain
drugs. UAB Hospital now requires physicians to
report payments from drug companies including
speaking engagements.

Partial disclosures for yearly commissions:
Dr. William Bailey $250,365; Dr. William Geisler
$201,570; Dr. Warner Huh $91,275; Dr. John
Northrock $78,000.

So doctors are peddling drugs legally.
Information from The Birmingham News,
April 3, 2011.

Is America the Land of the Free?

I wrote that the Criminal Federal Government people are NO WHERE near DC at this most crucial time when Katrina's Sister, Irene is ready to destroy everything in her path, even Washington DC. They all are hiding under their desk or dinner table thousands of miles away shaking in their panties afraid to show themselves. They're pushing their responsibility off on the States like they always do when they don't want to be part of the disaster and then blame everybody else for the tragedy.

I found this ariticle that verifies what I say which was written by someone who is more recognized as a published writer that I am. Not that I'm not a published writer, I'm just not "WELL Known", yet my writings have been found in other States than the one in which I write or have written. :P

So here is what Bob Livingston had to say:

The President and all 535 members of Congress
take oaths to uphold and defend the
U.S. Constitution. One has to wonder how many
have ever read it. They certainly seem hell-bent
on disregarding it.

Article 1, Section 1 says all legislative powers
are vested in Congress, which consists of a Senate
and a House of Representatives. That’s apparently
no longer the case, although I can’t find where
that was legally changed through an Amendment.
The Environmental Protection Agency
believes it holds legislative power. According
to U.S. News & World Report: “Two new EPA
pollution regulations will slam the coal industry
so hard that hundreds of thousands of jobs will
be lost, and electric rates will skyrocket 11 per -
cent to over 23 percent, according to a new study
based on government data.”

There is no Constitutional authority for an
EPA, nor is there Constitutional authority for
Congress to cede its lawmaking powers to the
EPA. But apparently, Congress doesn't’t care.

To read more follow the link:
http://www.boblivingstonletter.com

Friday, August 26, 2011

The FDA wants Americans to remain fat, unhealthy and ignorant.

I got my September Health News Letter from Bob Livinston and in the section entitled, "Walnuts Belong in Your Medicine Cabinet" it told what the FDA did and it pissed me off even more with our great Loser Federal Government. But I'll let you decide, becasue I might be a bias tick.

So heres part of what Bob wrote in his column:

The Food and Drug Administration sent a warning
letter to Diamond Foods, Inc., because the packaging
“misbranded” the product, causing them to be drugs.

The FDA’s letter says in part: “Based on
claims made on your firm’s website, we have
determined that your walnut products are
promoted for conditions that cause them to
be drugs because these products are intended
for use in the prevention, mitigation, and
treatment of disease.”

The labels cited studies indicating the
omega-3 fatty acids found in walnuts helped
lower cholesterol levels; protect against heart
disease, stroke and cancer; ease arthritis and
other inflammatory diseases; fight depression
and mental illness; and provide other health
benefits.

The FDA ordered Diamond Foods, Inc. to
correct the violations or face seizure of products
or court injunction.

Life Extension Magazine reported on the
letter in its August 2011 edition and cited a
number of published articles highlighting the
health benefits of walnuts. In other words, the
FDA is ignoring the science that proves the
healthful benefits of a natural food.

The FDA, which claims to look out for the
health of Americans, is doing just the opposite.
It obviously wants Americans to remain fat,
unhealthy and ignorant. How else to explain
an agency that ignores the science behind the
health benefits of natural whole foods while
allowing food manufacturers to get away with
the spurious claims they make on the health
benefits of processed foods like potato chips
and breakfast bars with simulated fruit
products they pass off as real fruit.

And it’s not just walnuts the FDA hates.
The FDA hates many natural foods like cherries,
blueberries, pomegranate juice and green tea.
All of these natural foods provide scientifically
proven health benefits, but the FDA ignores the
science and regulates whether and how those
benefits can even be stated on their packaging.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Prescription Drug Shortage Hits U.S. Doctors and Hospitals

If you though that it hurt when the nurse or doctor shoved that thermometer up your A$$ wait for this drug shortage that BIG PHAMA is gonna shove somewhere... And I believe that this is from this CRIMINAL Political Administration, backed and demanded by Puppet Master Soros.

Prescription Drug Shortage Hits U.S. Doctors and Hospitals
Lack of drugs has caused patient deaths, many at risk


by: Charlotte Huff | from: AARP Bulletin | August 5, 2011

Critical shortages of lifesaving drugs are threatening hospital care in America, delaying patient treatment and limiting the medicines doctors can prescribe and the anesthetics they can use to perform surgery.

In the past few weeks, several pharmaceutical giants have warned doctors not to start patients on some medicines because they can't guarantee a steady supply, and hospitals have begun rationing some vital drugs. The Food and Drug Administration had reports of 180 drug shortages as of July 31, a number that already surpasses the record 178 shortages reported for all of last year.

The ever-increasing shortages particularly affect older Americans because they undergo more surgeries and cancer treatments, doctors say. They also are more likely to have medical conditions that can make it difficult to find a suitable substitute when the drug they need is unavailable.

Recent surveys by hospital and pharmacist groups tell the troubling story. A national survey by the American Hospital Association in June found that 99.5 percent of hospitals have experienced one or more drug shortages in the last six months. Nearly half of the 820 representative hospitals contacted — 44 percent — reported shortages of more than 21 drugs.

Moreover, 63 percent of the hospitals reported that in some cases, patients didn't receive the recommended treatment; 10 percent said that problem occurred frequently.

Because of the shortages, "we've had deaths … we've had medication errors," says Michael Cohen, a pharmacist and president at the nonprofit Institute for Safe Medication Practices in Horsham, Pa. As an example, he referred to the case this year in Alabama where 19 patients were seriously infected and nine died because a standard, premixed solution for IV feeding tubes wasn't available, so a pharmacy mixed its own and it was contaminated.

Drugs now in short supply — often given by injection or intravenously to patients in the hospital — are prescribed for a wide range of medical problems including cancer, allergies, heart disease and infectious diseases. Shortages involve some anesthetics for patients having surgery and "crash cart" drugs for emergencies — like epinephrine injections used to restart the heart — and even electrolytes for patients fed intravenously.

Johnson & Johnson recently warned doctors not to start cancer patients on Doxil, a widely used chemotherapy drug used to treat ovarian cancer and multiple myeloma.

At the nationally known M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at Houston, the supply of the thyroid cancer drug Thyrogen (thyrotropin alfa) was so tight by mid-July that the cancer specialists began triage — giving patients the drug according to the severity of their case, says Wendy Smith, a clinical pharmacy manager there. The Thyrogen shortage, Smith says, "puts us in a new frontier where we are actually delaying [treatment] in situations where there is no drug alternative."


Beth Frank, who lives in a suburb of Dallas, was diagnosed two years ago with a rare and aggressive form of thyroid cancer. In June, she was scheduled for her third radioactive iodine treatment, designed to kill any remaining, scattered cancer cells. But the 50-year-old administrative assistant has been waiting two frustrating months for the procedure — now scheduled for mid-August in a local hospital — because Thyrogen wasn't available. The drug helps thyroid cancer patients avoid the sometimes severe side effects — including depression, fatigue and pain — of hormone withdrawal.

Genzyme, the manufacturer of Thyrogen, said it anticipates supply disruptions to continue into 2012.

Why the shortages of these critical drugs? The FDA says the problems mainly stem from manufacturing issues, such as drug production temporarily shut down because the plant wasn't sterile. Sometimes, though, the shortages are tied to disruptions in the supply of raw materials or to increased demand for some drugs. And, the FDA says, some companies have simply stopped making older, less profitable drugs, particularly older sterile injectable drugs.

When one company has a problem or discontinues a drug, it's difficult for other manufacturers to increase production quickly. The FDA recently asked manufacturers to report production problems or changes that might cause potential shortages.

Remedies vary but the FDA can work with other U.S. manufacturers to ramp up their production of a drug in limited supply or search overseas for suitable companies willing to import the drug. It also can help drugmakers locate new supplies of raw material and certify them for import.

The drug supply glitches, which vary from region to region and week to week, have triggered congressional interest because the FDA is limited in what it can do to solve the problem. Currently, the federal agency cannot require firms to report drug shortages, give the reason for a shortage or even provide an estimate about how long the shortage might last.

Some manufacturers voluntarily report supply problems, says Cynthia Reilly, a pharmacist and a director at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. But, she says, a pharmacist may not know until "they open the order they just placed and it's not in there."

That group backs legislation that would require manufacturers to notify the FDA of potential supply problems involving key medicines.

Meanwhile, the FDA is asking health workers and patients to report shortages to the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at drugshortages@fda.hhs.gov.

Thursday, August 18, 2011



Data caps
Even unlimited access has its limits


Aug 17th 2011, 7:37 by G.F. | SEATTLE

HUMPTY DUMPTY told Alice that "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." American telecommunications companies seem to have adopted a similar semantic strategy when they use the word "unlimited". AT&T is the latest to join the bandwagon. It has just imposed a cap on unlimited mobile data plans for the heaviest users, soon to be followed by limits, and fees for exceeding them, on its wired broadband network. The deployment of zippy next-generation 4G networks, too, is hampered by outdated caps on usage many telecoms firms have and will put in place.

Verizon Wireless engaged in doublespeak of its own several years ago with its first-generation 3G offering, which the operator plugged as "Unlimited Broadband Access".

This is just a teaser of what's coming for your "Unlimited Data Plan" so go to the link below to read what's going on:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/08/data-caps

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Where to put Obama's picture

George Washington, our nation's first president and leader of the American Revolution!

Abe Lincoln, honorable leader pulled our nation through its darkest time!

Alexander Hamilton, founding father, first secretary of the treasure and leader of the constitutional convention!

Andrew Jackson, "Old Hickory " fought the British in New Orleans !

Ulysses Grant, Union army general, lead the North through the Civil War!

Ben Franklin, Genius inventor, political theorist and leading author of the constitution.

Finally, we have someone to put on the food stamp!!!!!!!

Obama's policies will put more people on welfare than any president before him so this placement is most appropriate. Unlike the Nobel Peace Prize, for which he did nothing, this is an "honor" he richly deserves.





Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Obama clashes with Tea Party member

As ususal My Commentary comes first and everybody else follows:

Welcome to the government administration of lies...Did you think that I was just limiting this to the lying Obutthead adminstration? Wrong!! We've been lied to by all of the Hate American Politician Organizations (HAPO) since the death of the last Founding Father in the mid 1800's, sad to say.

Here's a quote that fits what I'm talking about and this was stated in 1776:
"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." --Thomas Paine, The American Crises, No. 1, 1776

It sure is ashamed that only Three Percent of the men and women of the Colonial times stood up to the enemy, and guess what? ONLY Three Percent will do it again, because the other 97% of the people who claim to be Citizens of the United States are chickenshit losers and love the enemies of the United States more than loving the Greatest Country in the World.

How can I say that? WE the United States GIVE MORE to our enemies than to our FRIENDS, and demand NOTHING from our ENEMIES, but DEMAND EVERYTHING from our FRIENDS. Pretty CHICKEN SHIT if you ask me, but then that's the GOVERNMENT THAT YOU 97% love.

Nuff said, here's the story of another LIE from the Government and the moron who thinks his SHIT don't stink:

By David Jackson, USA TODAY Aug 16, 2011



President Obama came face-to-face with the Tea Party last night in Iowa, clashing with a member during and after a town hall last night.

Ryan Rhodes, a group leader in the Hawkeye State, stood up and shouted a question during a town hall, asking the president how he can call for more civility when "your vice president is calling people like me, a Tea Party member, a 'terrorist.'"

Obama, who had not called on the man, said the town hall wouldn't work "if you just stand up when I asked everybody to raise their hand. ... I didn't see you. I wasn't avoiding you. ... Please."

After calling another person, Obama circled back to address Rhodes' question: "First of all, in fairness to this gentleman who raised a question, I absolutely agree that everybody needs to try to tone down the rhetoric.

"Now, in fairness, since I've been called a socialist who wasn't born in this country, who is destroying America and taking away its freedoms because I passed a health care bill, I'm all for lowering the rhetoric."
After the event, Obama came up to speak with Rhodes.

It's hard to quote their conversation exactly because of the music, but Rhodes again raised "the terrorist" comment and Obama defended his vice president, Joe Biden.

Biden has denied calling the Tea Party terrorists. A House Democrat used the term during a group meeting with Biden over the debt ceiling debate, but the vice president denied news reports that he echoed the comment.

Reform, pay cuts likely to widen gap between rich and poor hospitals

Before you get into this article, I want to say: To those of you who thought you were getting such a GREAT DEAL -- "YES WE CAN!!!" --- I hope that you enjoy the 'end' product, if you know what I mean. Most likely you won't, but this is because of NO Due Diligence. Thank YOU!

NOW FOR THE ARTICLE:

Analysts say physicians also could end up winners and losers, depending on who is affiliated with the larger health system.

By BOB COOK, amednews staff. Posted Aug. 15, 2011.

When it comes to hospitals and their financial health, they are either thriving or wheezing -- with no in-between.

"The gap between the haves and have-nots is getting bigger," said Samuel R. Maizel, who represents financially distressed hospitals as a partner at the Los Angeles-based law firm of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.

There isn't one official set of numbers that bears out his claim, but analysts say anyone who has seen news reports about hospitals alternately adding jobs or subtracting them is right in thinking that hospitals are either growing or struggling.

Larger, more well-capitalized hospitals always have had advantages over their smaller, less financially stable competitors. But analysts say health system reform, and declining or changing government payments, are making those differences more acute.

With quality-based payments and accountable care organizations a big part of health reform, analysts say the advantage goes to hospital systems that can assemble a network of primary care, specialty care and acute care services, and manage patient information electronically. Those systems that can't accomplish this either will die or be acquired by those that can.

"What is beginning to happen, and it's been happening for the last few years, is healthy systems are becoming aggregators of other hospitals," said Robert Betka, a hospital consultant and owner of Catalyst Management Advisers in Grand Rapids, Mich. "They are making sure they own the full spectrum of preventive care, primary care, specialty care and post-acute care. They are positioning for ACOs, pay-for-performance, and making sure they can keep dollars within the system across the entire continuum."

Also, with budgetary pressure to cut Medicare and Medicaid payments and make them more quality-based, those systems more reliant on government pay are hurting even before the bulk of health reform is scheduled to be implemented in 2014.

In a July 15 report, Moody's Investors Service said its ratio of bond ratings downgrades to upgrades was 4-to-1 in the second quarter of 2011, mostly because of decreased government funding. Moody's said 67% of the downgraded hospitals in the second quarter were those with less than $500 million of revenue, as were 72% of the downgraded facilities in the first half of the year.

Larger hospitals have been more aggressive in recent years about acquiring physician practices, affiliating with them or hiring physicians directly, analysts said. That could create winners and losers among physicians, determined by who is affiliated with the larger hospital system.

The model of a physician splitting privileges between multiple hospitals is changing, said Eric Johnson, senior vice president of Avalere Health's health care network practice. "Those splitters are receding from the marketplace," he said.

Maelstrom within the calm

By some measures, it appears hospitals as a whole are doing OK. The number of mass layoffs -- 50 or more employees cut at one time -- at hospitals was 63 through June, according to the Dept. of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. At that pace, there would be 126 for the year, fewer than the 137 in 2010 and the record 152 in the recessionary year of 2009. Meanwhile, after a slight decline in June, hospital jobs rebounded in July, going up 14,000 to a seasonally adjusted 4,755,800, according to the BLS.

Also, the Healthcare Finance Management Assn., in an Aug. 1 report, noted that hospitals' collective margin has stayed steady, at around 2.5% every year, since 2005.

Despite those seemingly positive numbers, analysts said, the hospital industry is going through changes that are shaking out financially weaker systems.

For one thing, even before health reform, there has been a long-term decline in hospitals' historic revenue generator -- inpatient care -- as a share of its collections. The percentage of hospitals' revenue that came from outpatient care increased from 20% in 1989 to 40% in 2009, the most recent year available, according to the American Hospital Assn.

The AHA also reported that Medicare and Medicaid payments have not met the cost of care since 1999, and are covering less of that cost every year. Hospitals collected $35 billion less from Medicaid and Medicare in 2009, the most recent year available, than the cost of the care provided, the AHA said.

Since that time, the necessity of collecting outpatient revenue, and the troubles for facilities that rely on government revenue, have grown even more critical, analysts said.

"The large hospitals that are parts of large chains, hospitals that have access to capital, are doing well and will do well under the new health care reform bill," Maizel said. "But stand-alone hospitals, undercapitalized rural hospitals, hospitals that see a high percentage of government reimbursement or those who are presently uninsured -- those hospitals are either going to merge or go out of business."

One of Maizel's clients is Victor Valley (Calif.) Hospital, a stand-alone facility that is in bankruptcy. On July 14, a judge allowed Prime Healthcare Services Foundation to buy the facility for $35 million, a deal awaiting the California attorney general's approval. Meanwhile, bankrupt or struggling nonprofit systems in Massachusetts and New Jersey are being purchased by for-profit systems. Money-losing West Penn Allegheny Health System in Pittsburgh was bought in June by a health plan, Highmark.

Although a few larger systems might trim some nonclinical workers to keep costs under control, in general they are expanding. For example, both IU Health and St. Vincent Health, two large primary-care-to-acute-care systems in Indianapolis, have announced plans to build 40-bed hospitals near the same exit off Interstate 69 in Fishers, Ind., where each already had outpatient locations. IU Health's will open in fall 2011, and St. Vincent's will open in December 2012.

"The ones that are hiring [are] teaching hospitals, large hospitals, well-known, good-name hospitals. Name-brand hospitals," said Mahmud Hassan, PhD, director of the Rutgers University Pharmaceutical MBA program in New Jersey and a professor of finance and economics at the school.

Johnson, of Avalere, said a few small hospitals still will find a place in the industry, particularly if they can burnish their reputations "in a niche-y sort of way." But in general, he said, with the growing emphasis on scale, and bigger hospitals' deeper pockets, "smaller hospitals are going to lose."

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Nero in the White House

By: Mychal Massie
Posted: August 08, 2011
5:20 pm Eastern

Three significant historical events have been eclipsed by Obama: 1) Jimmy Carter will no longer be looked upon as the worst president in American history; 2) Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton will no longer be recognized as the greatest liars in presidential history; 3) Clinton's stain on Monica's dress, and what that did to the White House in general and the office of the president specifically, will forever pale in comparison to the stain and stench of Obama.

I need not spend much time on the failure of Obama as president. His tenure has been a failure on every measurable level. So much so, in fact, that some of the staunchest, most respected liberal Democrats and Democratic supporters have not only openly criticized him – some even more harshly than this essayist – but they have called for him to step down.

Richard Nixon's words "I am not a crook," punctuated with his involvement in Watergate, and Bill Clinton's finger-wagging as he told one of the most pathetic lies in presidential history, in the aftermath of Obama, will be viewed as mere prevarications.

Mr. Nixon and Clinton lied to save their backsides. Although, I would argue there are no plausible explanations for doing what they did, I could entertain arguments pursuant to understanding their rationales for lying. But in the case of Obama, he lies because he is a liar. He doesn't only lie to cover his misdeeds – he lies to get his way. He lies to belittle others and to make himself look presentable at their expense. He lies about his faith, his associations, his mother, his father and his wife. He lies and bullies to keep his background secret. His lying is congenital and compounded by socio-psychological factors of his life.

Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood.

As the stock markets were crashing, taking with them the remaining life saving of untold tens of thousands, Obama was hosting his own birthday celebration, which was an event of epicurean splendidness. The shamelessness of the event was that it was not a state dinner to welcome foreign dignitaries, nor was it to honor an American accomplishment – it was to honor the Pharaoh, Barack Hussein Obama. The event's sole purpose was for the Pharaoh to have his loyal subjects swill wine, indulge in gluttony and behavior unfit to take place on the property of taxpayers, as they suffer. It was of a magnitude comparable to that of Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski's $2 million birthday extravaganza for its pure lack of respect for the people.

Permit me to digress momentarily. The U.S. Capitol and the White House were built with the intent of bringing awe and respect to America and her people. They were also built with the intent of being the greatest of equalizers. I can tell you, having personally been to both, there is a moment of awe and humility associated with being in the presence of the history of those buildings. They are to be honored and inscribed into our national psyche, not treated as a Saturday night house party at Chicago's Cabrini-Green.

The people of America own that home Obama and his wife continue to debase with their pan-ghetto behavior. It is clear that Obama and family view themselves as royalty, but they're not. They are employees of "we the people," who are suffering because of his failed policies. What message does this behavior send to those who today are suffering as never before?

What message does it send to all Americans who are struggling? Has anyone stopped to think what the stock market downturn forebodes for those 80 million baby boomers who will be retiring in the next period of years? Is there a snowball's chance in the Sahara that every news program on the air would applaud this behavior if it were George W. Bush? To that point, do you remember the media thrashing Bush took for having a barbecue at the White House?

Like Nero – who was only slightly less debaucherous than Caligula – with wine on his lips Obama treated "we the people" the way Caligula treated those over whom he lorded.

Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement – while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed.

Mychal Massie is chairman of the National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives-Project 21 – a conservative black think tank located in Washington, D.C. He was recognized as the 2008 Conservative Man of the Year by the Conservative Party of Suffolk County, N.Y. He is a nationally recognized political activist, pundit and columnist. He has appeared on Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, C-SPAN, NBC, Comcast Cable and talk radio programming nationwide. A former self-employed business owner of more than 30 years, Massie can be followed at mychal-massie.com.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Finish The Story

"I can't do it, Lord," she cried. "It's too hard for me, I just can't."

Deborah seemd to be having one of her down times in believing at this moment. Everytime she turned around, figuratively speaking, she seemed to come up against a brick wall in her life. Trials are a hard thing to go through and we're told that without having to struggle to acheive things in life, we won't appreciate them when they do come our way.

"Well, are you going to help me,Lord," she pleaded. Or are you going to let me do it all by myself so You can watch me stumble some more," she asked. "You know that I'm weak," she pleaded. "Have some mercy on me," she groaned.

Deborah laid there unable to get up after the beating she endured from her tormentor. Her body lifelessly laying there, breathing so shallow that it was hard to know whether she was alive or dead. Her eyes barely open, her pulse very weak, yet she was able to see her favorite palm tree through the open doors of the barn. Deborah couldn't tell if she was in the flesh or in spirit form.


NOW IT'S TIME FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO PICK UP THE STORY LINE AND ADD TO THE DRAMA. THE LAST SENTENCE OF THE STORY IS: Deborah longed to be sitting under the shade of her palm tree. USE THE COMMENTS BOX TO ADD YOUR LINES TO THE STORY.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Seals Die In A Helicopter That Was Shot Down

I believe that this incident was an inside job by our government and you'll see what I mean as you read what the wire news said and by what I point out, and from my conclusion of what will happen. HOWEVER, I could be wrong, since these glasses that I wear -- these High Definitions glasses -- could be tainted just a little, but I've see this scenario played out before by our previous Crooked Political Administrations.

This was the headline news from CNN:

Kabul, Afghanistan (CNN) — The U.S. military was reeling Saturday after a helicopter went down in eastern Afghanistan, killing 31 Americans, including 22 Navy SEALs, a U.S. military official told CNN Saturday.

Notice what it says here, "a U.S. military official told..." Who is this military official? Why is he anonymous? Will this person play a role later in this incident? We'll see.

In the single deadliest incident since the start of the decade-long Afghan war, an Army Chinook carrying a team of U.S. special forces and U.S. and Afghan soldiers went down in Wardak province. Insurgents are believed to have shot down the helicopter, the military official said.

Here we are again with an anonymous military official giving information about "Insurgents shooting down this helicopter..." How does this military official know it was done by "Insurgents?" We heard some chatter about the enemy Insurgents claiming responsibility, but then again, who believes what the enemy has to say. They're all liars, and if the weren't they wouldn't have their faces covered. What are they trying to hid? If you cover your face with a rag and you say something, it means that you don't want to become known and get caught,thus you become a liar by hiding and make statements that might not be the truth. A liar always hides what he or she doesn't want known about them to throw off those who are looking for them.

The majority of the Navy SEALs who died belonged to the same covert unit that conducted the raid that killed Osama bin Laden in May, though they were not the same men, the official said.

Here's some truth that someone in our government wants to prove to us about what had happened and that it is true: "The majority of the Navy SEALs who died belonged to the same covert unit..." Interesting. What did these Seals know? Why were these Seals in a helicopter that didn't have any armament? Who knew the route that they were taking? How did the enemy know when and where this helicopter would be so it could be destroyed?

President Barack Obama mourned the deaths of the American troops, saying in a statement that the crash serves as a reminder of the "extraordinary sacrifices" being made by the U.S. military and its families. He said he also mourned "the Afghans who died alongside our troops."

"President Barack Obama mourned...?" I can't see an Enemy of the State mourning for someone he or she hates, especially America's finest -- Seal Team Six.

Do you want to know what I think happened? I think that this Seal Team was killed to prevent them from bringing to light some of the intelligence about what had taken place in the supposedly killing of Osama Bin Laden. Bin Laden's body was never seen by anybody before it was supposedly dumped in the ocean, IF it was ever dumped and/or if he was ever killed.

I believe that these Seals were killed so that down the road,the truth would not surface as to where Bin Laden went and why he was removed. After all, isn't it stated by many that Obama is a muslim too? Isn't it known that Obama has CIA connections with special favors for life?

I think that sometime down the road, the person that caused this helicopter to explode and killing all aboard will also meet the same fate, because he or she is a loose end that needs to be silenced by another covert agent who will also die a strange death.

That's how the Mob does things, that is, until the last loose end is removed or tied and there's no evidence tracing the incident back to the originator of the scheme...The President of the United States. The Enemy of the State.