I’m tired of hearing the lies about global warming, so I decided to check it out for myself, and I found that I was right in my thinking and my observation of the facts.
And my findings indicate that the polar ice is BACK, all five million square miles.
So when it comes to global warming who am I to believe, credible scientists and climatologists or an idiot like Al ‘Mr. Eco’ Gore and his nonscientific ideology.
I think that Gore really believes that the polar bears are drowning (becoming extinct) and the penguins are flying away, but then that’s my observation of this looney-tooner.
It’s amazing that Al ‘Eco’ Gore refused to take the ‘Personal Energy Ethics Pledge’ at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on March 21, 2007.
Why would Mr. ‘Eco’ refuse to take this essential Eco Pledge?
This whacked-out hypocrite can’t even follow his own eco-religion correctly let alone tell others how they should eco-live it.
I can cite authority after authority with PhD’s and other scientific geniuses on this subject, but unless you check for yourself you won’t believe me no matter what I say.
Amazingly there’s global warming in the universe and specifically on the planet Mars with its ‘increased temperatures despite lack of humankind.’
I found another interesting fact, and that is an ‘advance and retreat of polar ice’ on the planet Mars, much like that of Earth.
Yes, ‘Mars might be just coming out of an ice age’.
When the Earth came out of its past ice ages and supposed global warming periods, I find that life was not hampered nor destroyed, but it thrived. Why?
Also, Jupiter is in the midst of global climate change that will alter temperatures by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and cooler near the South Pole.
It’s also noted that “Pluto’s atmospheric pressure has tripled over the past 14 years, indicating a stark temperature rise.”
It’s proposed that ‘the change is likely a seasonal event, much as seasons on Earth change as the hemispheres alter their inclination to the Sun during the planet’s annual orbit.’
What? Global warming may not be due to us stupid non-eco-idiots emitting CO2 gases from our vehicles or coal-fired plants…amazing.
Fact, Dr. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, maintains that there has been LITTLE or NO warming since about 1940.
Another interesting fact that I’ve always wondered about is why global warming seems to change daily.
It’s stated that water vapor (H2O) is Earth’s primary greenhouse gas, which leads to global warming.
This source go as far as stating that “water vapor contributes to the natural greenhouse warming process by approximately 60%.”
Also the rain and snow systems control how warm or how cold temperatures get on Earth.
It’s stated that ‘these weather systems directly limit how much of our main greenhouse gas, water vapor, is allowed to accumulate in the Earth's atmosphere.’
Furthermore, our biased eco-nuts continually misdiagnose the positive feedback regarding the temperature changes, because their equipment is not up to specs.
Some thermometers measuring temperature changes are placed outside by their air conditioning units, thus measuring the heat changes of the air conditioning unit.
On another front, Andrei Illarionov, an adviser of former President Putin, states that Kyoto is a ‘smokescreen of propaganda, like those ideologies of human hatred’.
Czech President Vaclav Klaus even states, “the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity…is not communism or its various softer variants."
Klaus continues, "Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism."
Senior Fellow Dennis Avery of the Hudson Institute said that “300 scientists have refuted at least one element of the global warming SCARE.”
Avery said that they have found evidence that a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to our current one.
Furthermore, Avery said “that since the last ice age such warmings are linked to variations in the sun’s irradiance.”
Still further, ‘these scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850.’
More than 31,000 scientists across the U.S. (including more than 9,000 Ph.D.s in fields such as atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and dozens of other specialties) have signed a petition rejecting “global warming”.
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate”.
I knew that these eco-morons weren’t telling us the truth and that all of these readings that they’re reporting were false.
Of course you can read the US Senate Report on Global Warming to see who is looney and who’s not.
Here’s looney; a man in Denver was trying to go green with his new house construction project until he was told by the city he would be penalized $9,000 for doing so.
Ken Oakes told reporters, "We want to build our house as green as possible, and that includes solar panels on the roof."
When the workers from the solar system company arrived at Oakes’ home, they brought with them some bad news.
There was a large Honeylocust tree that towered over the southwest corner of the house that would block the sunlight to the solar panel system.
So, Oakes then decided to cut the huge tree down for his house to be green.
However, Douglas Schoch, of the city's forestry division, said that there will be a $9,000 penalty, because that's what the city has decided the tree is worth.
The city arborist had e-mailed Oakes two options: protect the tree and move the solar panels somewhere else, or remove the tree and pay the penalty.
What a decision; cut it down and you pay, because there's no appeal process in eco-land.
The city told Oakes, however, that he could plant upwards of 45 other trees in the yard, at the estimated cost of $200 per tree credit which would wipe out the penalty.
This makes me want to just eco-puke.
No comments:
Post a Comment